Estate leads

Find owners and buyers, answer in minutes and book viewings without the back-and-forth.

Reference image for a property listing and buyer enquiry workflow

Situation and baseline

An independent property adviser receives enquiries through listing sites, its own pages, phone and messaging. Responses slow outside office hours, while staff verify basic fit before arranging a viewing.

The challenge

Make first contact timely without profiling protected characteristics, promising stale availability or crossing into financial and legal advice.

Approach and timeline

  1. Diagnose

    Define appropriate property facts and preferences, collection purpose, opt-out and the route to a human adviser.

  2. Design

    Connect approved listing records, enforce freshness checks and surface changes before drafting a response.

  3. Integrate

    Use transparent intake for viewing preferences, answer factual questions and assign a named adviser.

  4. Learn and refine

    Track eligible enquiries through response, qualification and viewing; separate channel, property and seasonality.

Agents, automations and stack

A listing agent retrieves approved facts and checks freshness; scheduling automation offers viewing slots and routes complex requests. AI drafts an adviser-reviewed reply. It does not score protected traits, recommend mortgages or give legal advice.

Deliverables

  • Enquiry and consent map
  • Freshness-controlled listings, adviser routing and funnel definitions

Outcome indicators

  • Qualified enquiries

    Baseline: 40 Target: 260

  • First-response time

    Baseline: 5 h Target: 4 min

  • Viewing conversion

    Baseline: 9% Target: 23%

  • Cost per qualified enquiry

    Baseline: €38 Target: €14

How we measure

Qualified enquiries follow predefined criteria and count unique valid requests. Response time starts when required information is available and ends at a human-approved useful response. Viewing conversion uses completed viewings in a defined window. Cost states included channel and processing costs.

Risks and guardrails

Follow fair-housing rules, minimize and protect enquiry data, show availability timestamps, preserve a human route and exclude affordability, legal and investment advice.

What comes next

Review conversion and fairness by channel and property type, test follow-up only with appropriate consent, and expand after freshness and ownership are reliable.

Related scenarios

Facing a comparable operating challenge?

We can map the workflow, establish a baseline and decide together whether automation is appropriate.

Discuss a workflow

Case studies info@mia17.com